Kaya proud ako na makahanay at kanila pong isinama ,вЂќ he said. Bawal kay Ping Lacson and Tito Sotto вЂyan. вЂњYung mga kasama natin dito walang sabit. He also promised to oversee the process of organizing the Department of Human Settlements and Urban Development (DHSUD.)Д®jercito then vouched for Lacson and SottoвЂ™s competence and clean track records. On the other hand, Del Rosario said he would push reforms that will improve the lives of athletes and people with special needs.Д®jercito reiterated the need to improve the implementation of the Universal Health Care Act, which he sponsored in the Senate during the 17th Congress. She made the commitment as she recall Lacson and SottoвЂ™s role in investigating alleged anomalies and irregularities within the state insurance system. Padilla, a practicing physician, vowed to introduce reforms in the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation.

Introducing himself as the вЂњSiga sa Senado,вЂќ Eleazar said he would pursue policies on security and order in the Senate, emphasizing that this is one of the factors that will contribute to the countryвЂ™s economic development. Minguita Padilla.ДЇormer Senator JV Ejercito and former Agriculture Secretary Manny PiГ±ol, senatorial bets from the Nationalist PeopleвЂ™s Coalition, were also present at the event. The tandemвЂ™s proclamation rally at Imus, Cavite was attended by senatorial candidates from Partido Reporma namely, former Philippine National Police chief Guillermo Eleazar, former Makati Rep. Imagine teachers trying to give equal weight to Holocaust deniers or being forced to talk about the good of slavery in America,В Democrats asked.IMUS-The Senate slate of presidential candidate Panfilo Lacson and vice presidential candidate Vicente Sotto III vowed reforms in law and order, healthcare system, and agriculture. Does that really mean teachers would have to give equal time and weight to arguments for or againstВ slavery or the Holocaust? It also requires teachers to give equal weight to both sides ofВ controversial topics.

ItВ bans teaching that вЂњan individual, by virtue of the individualвЂ™s race, ethnicity or sex is inherently racist, sexist or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously.вЂќ ItВ bans teachings that promoteВ that вЂњrace, ethnic group or sex is inherently morally or intellectually superior to another race, ethnic group or sex.вЂќ It bans districts, charter schools or state agencies from requiring educators to discuss controversial issues of public policy or social affairs. UdallвЂ™s proposal passed the HouseВ on a party-line vote. ItвЂ™s designed to ban what has become known as critical race theory, which examines the notion that racism in ingrained in the nationвЂ™s history. Michelle UdallвЂ™s amendment to Senate Bill 1532 doesnвЂ™t define вЂњcontroversial,вЂќ and she insisted during a Wednesday House floor discussion that it is about ensuring educators accurately portray what they teach students. Give equal weight toВ pro-slavery arguments? TheyвЂ™re taking part in a coordinated effort in Republican-controlled legislatures to limit what students are taught about race, racism and other current and historically contentious topics. But Arizona Republicans arenвЂ™t fooling anyone about what they really want to do and why theyвЂ™re doing it. ThatВ handcuffsВ everyone because вЂњcontroversialвЂќ could be anything anyone disagrees with.

Anyone whoВ вЂњknowingly aids another personвЂќ in teaching controversial things could be subject to a fine. Arizona House Republicans just voted to slap teachers with a $5,000 civil fine if they bring up a вЂњcontroversialвЂќ topic in the classroom.ДЄnd itвЂ™s not just teachers.

Slate care and feeding